<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inside the 2010 NFL Draft: An Interview with Shawn Zobel of Draft Headquarters.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bucscentral.com/nfl-draft/inside-the-2010-nfl-draft-an-interview-with-shawn-zobel-of-draft-headquarters-com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bucscentral.com/nfl-draft/inside-the-2010-nfl-draft-an-interview-with-shawn-zobel-of-draft-headquarters-com</link>
	<description>Your Balls to the wall source for Tampa Bay Buccanner news, information and wild ass opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:54:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The White Tiger</title>
		<link>http://www.bucscentral.com/nfl-draft/inside-the-2010-nfl-draft-an-interview-with-shawn-zobel-of-draft-headquarters-com/comment-page-1#comment-1496</link>
		<dc:creator>The White Tiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bucscentral.com/?p=2999#comment-1496</guid>
		<description>Roland - I agree - both scenarios (Detroit grabbing a QB, Lions grabbing a LT) most likely won&#039;t happen. My thoughts are that one of these might happen.

My gut tells me St Louis would be most prime - they want and need a QB, they&#039;ve passed on some of the best young talent at the position and probably especially envious of the Bucs/Freeman (taken mid first, performed as well as the elite QB&#039;s at the top of the draft). 

My belief (Did you see the theory I posted in four downs?)  is that they want one, they just don&#039;t want to pay 1st overall money for him because they&#039;ve been selecting at the top of the draft for several years and it hasn&#039;t made a difference. They need one, but maybe they don&#039;t think Clausen or Bradford are worth the 1st overall. Would they rather trade down? Only if they could be assured of not missing the player they want...Washington drafts after the Bucs...

I think the Bucs offer the Rams the best trade-down scenario - just don&#039;t know if the Buccaneer front office would be willing to trade up. All depends on the type of defense Raheem will run as to the type of tackle they value.

Will they be a 4-3 hybrid (augmenting with 3-4 concepts) or will they be a classic 4-3 utilizing a one-gap penetrator like Sapp?

If it&#039;s a hybrid, Suh has to be your man - if it&#039;s a one-gap, 4-3 - McCoy would fit.

That&#039;s how I see this playing out...but then again I believe that teams are utilizing the formula/theory to build what they think are winners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roland &#8211; I agree &#8211; both scenarios (Detroit grabbing a QB, Lions grabbing a LT) most likely won&#8217;t happen. My thoughts are that one of these might happen.</p>
<p>My gut tells me St Louis would be most prime &#8211; they want and need a QB, they&#8217;ve passed on some of the best young talent at the position and probably especially envious of the Bucs/Freeman (taken mid first, performed as well as the elite QB&#8217;s at the top of the draft). </p>
<p>My belief (Did you see the theory I posted in four downs?)  is that they want one, they just don&#8217;t want to pay 1st overall money for him because they&#8217;ve been selecting at the top of the draft for several years and it hasn&#8217;t made a difference. They need one, but maybe they don&#8217;t think Clausen or Bradford are worth the 1st overall. Would they rather trade down? Only if they could be assured of not missing the player they want&#8230;Washington drafts after the Bucs&#8230;</p>
<p>I think the Bucs offer the Rams the best trade-down scenario &#8211; just don&#8217;t know if the Buccaneer front office would be willing to trade up. All depends on the type of defense Raheem will run as to the type of tackle they value.</p>
<p>Will they be a 4-3 hybrid (augmenting with 3-4 concepts) or will they be a classic 4-3 utilizing a one-gap penetrator like Sapp?</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s a hybrid, Suh has to be your man &#8211; if it&#8217;s a one-gap, 4-3 &#8211; McCoy would fit.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s how I see this playing out&#8230;but then again I believe that teams are utilizing the formula/theory to build what they think are winners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.bucscentral.com/nfl-draft/inside-the-2010-nfl-draft-an-interview-with-shawn-zobel-of-draft-headquarters-com/comment-page-1#comment-1480</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 06:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bucscentral.com/?p=2999#comment-1480</guid>
		<description>I just wonder if the Rams who played Smith at RT last season are planning on switching Alex Barron back to the right side then? If the Bucs plan on landing one of the top two defensive tackles it looks as though either Detroit or St. Louis has to opt for another player or the Bucs must make a bold move and go up and get the player they covet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wonder if the Rams who played Smith at RT last season are planning on switching Alex Barron back to the right side then? If the Bucs plan on landing one of the top two defensive tackles it looks as though either Detroit or St. Louis has to opt for another player or the Bucs must make a bold move and go up and get the player they covet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The White Tiger</title>
		<link>http://www.bucscentral.com/nfl-draft/inside-the-2010-nfl-draft-an-interview-with-shawn-zobel-of-draft-headquarters-com/comment-page-1#comment-1479</link>
		<dc:creator>The White Tiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 06:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bucscentral.com/?p=2999#comment-1479</guid>
		<description>Roland - I think Clausen is climbing. I have read recently that Clausen is considered the most NFL ready - with an NFL arm capable of making all the throws and possessing excellent footwork.

He&#039;s not going to fit every offense, and if he goes to a team with a bad o-line, and a lack of weapons, he isn&#039;t going to be a savior (you know, the kind of teams usually at the top of the draft). Luckily though - the theory, or strategy being followed by teams seeking to build winners is to protect the QB, first.

Ideally, I think Clausen would fit in a drop-back type offense. If St Louis were to run a WCO, Bradford would seem to me to be a good fit.

I know St Louis has a rock-solid LT in Jason Smith - so whomever they select LT will be strength.

I think if Clausen shows off some of these traits at the combine, he will be the Rams pick.

Leading up to this season I would have thought Bradford was their guy - and unless he does something that blows folks away at the combine - his injury history will probably land him in the 2nd round.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roland &#8211; I think Clausen is climbing. I have read recently that Clausen is considered the most NFL ready &#8211; with an NFL arm capable of making all the throws and possessing excellent footwork.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s not going to fit every offense, and if he goes to a team with a bad o-line, and a lack of weapons, he isn&#8217;t going to be a savior (you know, the kind of teams usually at the top of the draft). Luckily though &#8211; the theory, or strategy being followed by teams seeking to build winners is to protect the QB, first.</p>
<p>Ideally, I think Clausen would fit in a drop-back type offense. If St Louis were to run a WCO, Bradford would seem to me to be a good fit.</p>
<p>I know St Louis has a rock-solid LT in Jason Smith &#8211; so whomever they select LT will be strength.</p>
<p>I think if Clausen shows off some of these traits at the combine, he will be the Rams pick.</p>
<p>Leading up to this season I would have thought Bradford was their guy &#8211; and unless he does something that blows folks away at the combine &#8211; his injury history will probably land him in the 2nd round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.bucscentral.com/nfl-draft/inside-the-2010-nfl-draft-an-interview-with-shawn-zobel-of-draft-headquarters-com/comment-page-1#comment-1478</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 06:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bucscentral.com/?p=2999#comment-1478</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d also like to know why Freddie Barnes a player that seemingly has soft hands and good route running ability, is not being talked about more as a mid-round prospect?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d also like to know why Freddie Barnes a player that seemingly has soft hands and good route running ability, is not being talked about more as a mid-round prospect?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.bucscentral.com/nfl-draft/inside-the-2010-nfl-draft-an-interview-with-shawn-zobel-of-draft-headquarters-com/comment-page-1#comment-1477</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 05:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bucscentral.com/?p=2999#comment-1477</guid>
		<description>I am a little surprised that Brian Price is viewed as a player that has a motor the runs hot and cold and that Zobel doesn&#039;t feel either Bradford or Clausen are worth taking in the first round. It will be a very interesting few months with all the subject for debate and speculation leading up to the draft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a little surprised that Brian Price is viewed as a player that has a motor the runs hot and cold and that Zobel doesn&#8217;t feel either Bradford or Clausen are worth taking in the first round. It will be a very interesting few months with all the subject for debate and speculation leading up to the draft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

